Overtourism & Residents’ Rights:
When a Place Says Enough
By Steven Keen
MSc Responsible Tourism Management (in progress), GSTC- and ICRT-certified
18 min read Updated on Sources verified on
A destination is also an address. Behind the over-photographed square is someone’s walk to work, someone’s rent, someone’s night’s sleep—and across southern Europe, a growing number of them have stopped asking politely. This page is about the moment tourism stops behaving like a guest and starts behaving like a landlord—and what a traveler owes a place that has had enough.
Key Takeaways
- Overtourism is not a headcount—it is a power shift: the point where a place is run for its visitors over the people who live there. The UN’s own report frames it around residents’ quality of life, not crowd size.
- The stakes are rights, not moods. A resident’s claim to housing (UDHR Article 25), mobility, rest, and a neighborhood that still works is the ethical core overtourism erodes—one flat, one street at a time.
- The mechanism is a price signal, not a villain: a home earns more by the night than by the month, so it stops being a home. Short-term rentals measurably raise the rents that push residents out.
- The traveler’s move is not to stay home—it is to come as a guest of residents, not a customer of a place: off-peak, off-center, in a licensed bed, spending into the neighborhood, and backing the cities that put residents first.
What Overtourism Actually Is
The word is younger than the problem. The travel-industry outlet Skift coined “overtourism” in 2016; by 2018 it was on Oxford’s Word-of-the-Year shortlist, and UN Tourism had given it a skeptical, book-length examination that treated it largely as a new name for older, well-studied problems—crowd congestion and the decades-old idea of tourism carrying capacity.1 The quotation marks in that report’s own title—‘Overtourism’?—are doing deliberate work. The people who study destinations for a living wanted to slow the panic and ask what, precisely, was new.
What is new is not the crowd. Crowds are as old as the Grand Tour. What is new is the scale and the arithmetic: international arrivals climbed from 25 million in 1950 to 1.3 billion in 2017, on course for 1.8 billion by 2030.1 Concentrate that growth on the same few squares, in the same few months, and you get places where visitors are no longer guests among residents but a population in their own right. Hallstatt, an Austrian village of roughly 800 people, has drawn up to 10,000 day-trippers in a single day.2 At that ratio the question stops being how to host visitors. It becomes who the place is for.
Overtourism is not a number of tourists. It is the moment a place starts being run for the people passing through it, over the people who live there.
That is the definition worth keeping, and it is close to the one the field’s own scholars reach. Claudio Milano, Marina Novelli, and Joseph Cheer—who did more than anyone to turn the buzzword into an academic subject—define overtourism through its casualties: the excessive growth of visitors “leading to overcrowding in areas where residents suffer the consequences of temporary and seasonal tourism peaks.”3 Notice who stands at the center of that sentence. Not the monument, not the queue, not the visitor’s disappointing photo. The resident.
This matters because the headcount misleads. UN Tourism’s researchers surveyed residents across eight European cities—Amsterdam, Barcelona, Berlin, Copenhagen, Lisbon, Munich, Salzburg, Tallinn—and found that most did not want visitor numbers capped outright.1 What they named, again and again, was something more specific than “too many people”: rising prices for housing, transport, shops, and restaurants—the daily cost of living in a place reorganized around someone else’s holiday. Overtourism is measured not at the turnstile but at the rent tribunal.
The Rights a Place Holds
Most of the conversation treats overtourism as a sustainability problem—a question of load, capacity, and wear. That is real, and our companion resource on responsible tourism takes up the systems side in depth. But it is not the whole problem, and on an ethics page it is not even the main one. Underneath the congestion sits a quieter claim that carrying-capacity math never quite captures: a destination is where somebody lives, and living somewhere confers rights.
The first is housing. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights places a home inside “the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family.”4 That is aspirational; its binding successor is not. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights makes the right to adequate housing law for the states that signed it, and the UN’s own interpretation spells out that “adequate” means, among other things, affordable—housing whose cost does not swallow the occupant’s other needs.5 A city that prices its own residents out of their own neighborhoods is not merely crowded. It is failing a duty it agreed to.
The others are harder to name and no less felt: the right to move through your own streets, to sleep without a stag party under the window, to buy bread rather than fridge magnets, to grow old among neighbors instead of key-boxes. Half a century ago the philosopher Henri Lefebvre gathered these into a phrase—le droit à la ville, the right to the city—the claim that a city belongs to the people who inhabit and make it, not to the capital that trades it. David Harvey sharpened it into a line an ethics page can use: the right to the city is “far more than a right of individual access to the resources that the city embodies: it is a right to change ourselves by changing the city… a common rather than an individual right.”6
Put plainly, this is the same principle the rest of this site keeps reaching from different directions. On the wildlife page it is the animal’s interest that cannot consent; on the human-rights page it is free, prior, and informed consent—the standard international law reserves for Indigenous peoples, which this resource scales down to every photograph. Overtourism is that same question at the size of a neighborhood: was anyone here asked?
A visitor has a right to see a place. A resident has a prior right to live in one. When the two collide, ethics does not flip a coin—it asks who was there first, and who cannot leave when the season ends.
How a Neighborhood Tips
None of this requires a villain. The machinery of overtourism runs on one unspectacular fact: in a desirable place, a home earns more rented by the night than by the month. Follow that incentive and a neighborhood tips—not by anyone’s decision, but by arithmetic.
The sequence is well documented. Apartments leave the long-term market for the nightly one, so housing supply falls and rents rise. Residents priced out are replaced by guests who never stay. The grocer, the cobbler, and the hardware store—businesses that need residents—give way to the souvenir shop, the luggage-storage counter, and the third artisanal-gelato franchise, which need only footfall. The neighborhood that tourists came to see—because it was full of the life of the people who lived there—empties of exactly those people, and keeps the façade. Scholars have two names for it, and a useful quarrel about them: Kevin Fox Gotham reads it as a form of gentrification—“tourism gentrification”—7 while Jordi Sequera and João Nofre argue that “touristification” is a distinct process, displacement driven not by a richer resident moving in but by the visitor who does not live there at all.8
The housing link is not a hunch; it has been measured. A peer-reviewed study of United States cities found that a 1% increase in Airbnb listings raised local rents by about 0.018%—tiny per listing, but enough, in aggregate, to account for roughly a fifth of the rent growth those markets saw.9 Where tourists most want to be, the share runs far higher. Barcelona’s own government reckons its rents rose about 68% in a decade—the pressure behind the policy this page closes on.10
None of this shows up in a crowd count. It shows up in a day. Walk one—a resident’s twenty-four hours, an hour at a time:
One resident · twenty-four hours
The Resident’s Day
What an overtouristed neighborhood takes, hour by hour
8hours of a day
quietly taken
6 AM · services
The grocer is gone.
The ground-floor shop that sold bread and nails is a luggage-storage counter now; the first delivery van idles, with nowhere left to unload.
The cost: A neighborhood that no longer supplies the people who live in it.
8 AM · mobility
The commute crawls.
Wheelie-suitcases queue at the key-box next door—the flat changed guests again—and the street you grew up on has become somebody’s arrivals hall.
The cost: The right to move through your own morning.
10 AM · services
The pharmacy is a gelato shop.
The chemist, the cobbler, the hardware store—the businesses that need residents—are priced out by the ones that need only footfall.
The cost: A high street that serves visitors, not the lives around it.
1 PM · economy
Lunch is priced for the terrace.
The taverna re-set its menu for the view, not the neighbors; the people it was built to feed now eat at home.
The cost: A place grown too expensive for the people who make it worth visiting.
5 PM · housing
The landlord is “going touristic.”
The lease won’t be renewed: the flat earns more by the night than by the month. Barcelona’s rents rose about 68% in a decade exactly this way.
The cost: The right to adequate housing—UDHR Article 25.
7 PM · public space
You queue to pass your own door.
The square you crossed as a child is a photo line now; residents wait their turn through the crowd that came to see where they live.
The cost: The right to the city—a common right, not a visitor’s.
11 PM · rest
You can’t sleep.
The apartment below has hosted three different stag weekends this month; the wall between a home and a hotel was never built to be one.
The cost: The right to a night’s rest in your own bed.
2 AM · rest
The “stay away” hour.
Amsterdam aimed a whole campaign at the 2 a.m. visitor. It was aimed at the noise—but it is the resident who is still awake.
The cost: The proof that the model, not the guest, is the problem.
A destination is somebody’s twenty-four hours. Overtourism is the day a place stops belonging to the people who live it.
Embed this graphic
Free to embed. The embed keeps a visible credit linking back to this page.
A home that earns more by the night than by the month will not stay a home for long. Overtourism is what a housing market does when nobody decides the neighborhood is not for sale.
This is why “just spread the tourists out” is only half an answer. Dispersing crowds eases the congestion; it does nothing about the incentive that turns homes into inventory. The pressure is structural, and structural pressure is answered by structure—which is exactly what the cities in the next section reached for.
When Cities Answer Back
For a decade the standard response to overtourism was a slogan aimed at individuals: travel responsibly. It did not work, because the pressure was never individual. So the places under the most strain stopped asking tourists to behave and started changing the rules—each testing a different theory of what actually protects a resident. The results are instructive precisely because they are mixed.
| The pressure on residents | What the city did—and how it is holding up | |
|---|---|---|
| Venice | A historic centre hollowed out—fewer than 49,000 residents remain, against tens of millions of visitors a year. | A €5 day-tripper access fee (2024) to meter the peak. It raised revenue but, by wide agreement, did little to thin the crowds. Metering is not the same as protecting. |
| Barcelona | Rents up roughly 68% in a decade; whole stairwells converted to nightly lets. | A 2017 freeze on new tourist lodging, then a 2024 plan to abolish all 10,101 tourist-flat licences by 2028 and return them to housing. The boldest resident-first move of the four—see the case study below. |
| Amsterdam | Overnight stays past 20 million a year; stag tourism degrading the central districts. | A ban on new hotels (2024), a cap on cruise calls, and a blunt “stay away” campaign. Real regulation—though the 20-million ceiling is a target the city has already breached. |
| Dubrovnik | A walled UNESCO town swamped by cruise passengers arriving on a single tide. | A “Respect the City” cap of two cruise ships and about 5,000 cruise passengers a day (2019). Volume control at the gate—among the clearer successes here. |
The through-line is easy to miss under the variety. The measures that touch residents’ lives most work on volume and on housing: Amsterdam’s ban on new hotels,11 Dubrovnik’s hard cap on cruise arrivals,12 Barcelona’s conversion of tourist flats back into homes. The measure that merely prices the visitor—Venice’s entry fee—raises money without moving the crowd. All of this is the practical face of an older idea the UN Tourism report leans on: carrying capacity, the most people a place can hold before its environment and its residents’ quality of life degrade.1 The concept is genuinely useful and genuinely slippery—there is no single honest number, because the limit depends on the place, the season, and who is counting. Which is the point an ethics page has to press: when the number cannot be settled by measurement, it has to be settled by judgment—whose comfort counts, and whose loss.
It is worth being fair to the visitor here, too. Venice’s €5 fee raised about €2.4 million on 485,000 passes in its first year but was widely judged a failure at deterring day-trippers;13 its resident population has fallen below 49,000,14 and UNESCO’s own World Heritage Centre urged the Committee to place it on the List of World Heritage in Danger in 2023—a step the Committee declined, asking Italy for a fuller plan first.15 Not every measure is proportionate, and not every fear is founded; the UN’s own researchers found many residents did not want tourism capped at all. But the direction is unmistakable: the places that host the world are, one by one, deciding that hosting cannot mean surrender.
Is “Tourismphobia” Fair?
When residents finally push back, the coverage reaches for a tidy word: tourismphobia. It began in the Spanish press to describe the mood in Barcelona and Palma, and it does a quiet, clever thing—it relocates the problem from the housing market to the residents’ psychology, recasting a grievance as a pathology.3 A phobia is irrational. Frame the neighbor with the water pistol as a xenophobe, and you need not answer what she is protesting.
So it is worth being precise about what the protests actually say. In July 2024, a few thousand residents walked down Barcelona’s Ramblas and sprayed diners with water pistols under banners reading “Barcelona is not for sale.” In April 2024, tens of thousands marched across the Canary Islands behind the slogan Canarias tiene un límite—the Canaries have a limit. In June 2025, a network calling itself SET—Southern Europe against Touristification—coordinated protests across some sixteen cities in Spain, Portugal, and Italy on a single day.16 The recurring chant is not “we hate foreigners.” It is closer to “your holidays, my misery”—a complaint about a housing model, aimed at the model, not the guest.
The ethical distinction is the whole game, and travelers should hold onto it in both directions. The visitor is welcome; the volume is the problem. A resident objecting to the conversion of her building into a hotel is not objecting to you; she is objecting to a system that treats her home as your amenity. It is equally true that hostility aimed at individual travelers—the stray sign telling a specific family to “go home”—crosses a line an ethics resource will not pretend it doesn’t. But the honest reading of a water pistol is not hatred. It is the sound of people who were never asked, asking to be.
“Tourismphobia” is the word chosen by everyone who would rather diagnose the resident than answer her. The protests are not a fear of visitors. They are a demand to be consulted about one’s own home.
THE CODE · FREE · NO EMAIL
For a Week, You Live Here Too
An ethical trip is never guessed—it is checked into existence. Eleven evidence-based pages that turn good intentions into questions you can book on. Free and yours to keep.
Get the free codeWhat You Can Do
No single traveler causes overtourism, and no single traveler cures it—the fix is mostly policy, made by the cities in the case study below. But the model runs on demand, and demand is assembled one booking at a time. Six choices move a booking from the problem toward the answer:
- Go off-peak and off-center. The single most effective thing a traveler can do is refuse the peak—the same month, the same square, the same island as everyone else. Shoulder seasons and second cities spread the load the UN’s own strategy list puts first.1
- Sleep where you evict no one. Prefer a hotel or a licensed, registered rental over an unlicensed flat that ate a home. If a listing cannot show a licence number in a city that requires one, that is your answer.
- Spend into the neighborhood, not onto it. The family taverna, the local grocer, the guide who lives there—money spent with residents is the version of tourism residents rarely protest.
- Treat residential space as residential. Someone sleeps behind that photogenic door. Keep the noise, the crowding, and the camera to what you would accept on your own street.
- Reward the places that protect residents. Pay the tourist tax and the entry fee without grumbling—it is rent for the impact you bring—and favor destinations, like the one below, that have chosen residents over volume.
- Refuse the urgency. “See it before it’s ruined” is the reasoning that ruins it. A place worth crossing the world for is worth visiting slowly, in a quieter month, more than once—not consumed in a single overloaded peak.
Run the whole decision through the three questions: can the place absorb this, is anyone accountable for the impact, and—the one this page presses—is it right by the people who live there? For the fullest picture of a living place that has kept the balance so far, see how the same arithmetic plays out on Crete.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is overtourism?
What is the difference between overtourism and a place just being crowded?
Is it wrong to visit Venice, Barcelona, or other overtouristed places?
Are anti-tourism protests just xenophobia—“tourismphobia”?
Do tourist taxes and entry fees fix overtourism?
Case Study: Barcelona
Rights stay abstract until a government spends political capital on them. Barcelona—cited here as a third-party example, not a partner of this resource—is the clearest case of a major city choosing its residents over its most profitable visitors, and making the choice stand up in court.
2017: the freeze
- Under Mayor Ada Colau, Barcelona approved a Special Urban Plan (PEUAT) that banned new tourist-accommodation licences of any kind in the saturated centre—the first plan of its scope by a major European city. Struck down on a technicality, it was re-enacted, near-identical, in 2021.17
2024: the reversal
- On 21 June 2024, Mayor Jaume Collboni announced that all 10,101 licensed tourist apartments in the city will be abolished by November 2028 and returned to residential housing—a response to rents that had risen roughly 68% in a decade.10
2025: it holds
- In March 2025, Spain’s Constitutional Court upheld the Catalan law the plan rests on, ruling that withdrawing a tourist licence is not an expropriation—an owner can still live in the flat or rent it long-term. The policy now has legal certainty.18
What is proven—and what is not
Proven: the plan exists, is specific, is legally secure, and the city has already returned roughly 3,500 illegally let flats to residential use. Unresolved: total visitor numbers are still rising—around 16 million came in 2025—so capping apartments has not, by itself, thinned the crowds; the tourist tax keeps climbing rather than volumes falling; the apartment-owners’ association is still litigating; and whether the demand simply migrates to the surrounding metro area is untested. The 2028 deadline is a commitment, not a finished result.
The lesson is not that Barcelona has solved overtourism—it plainly has not. It is that a place can decide, in law and against its own short-term revenue, that it is a home first and a destination second. That decision is exactly what a traveler’s choices are meant to reward: go, spend with residents, come off-peak—and let the cities doing the hard part know it was the right call.
Letters from inside the question
Once a Month, a Letter from Crete
Most travel writing is polished, and written from the outside. This one is unfiltered and written from within: a mountain village on Crete. No noise.
No spam. Ever. Leave anytime. Our Privacy Policy.
Steven spent a decade making documentaries in the places tourism forgets—with his work held in the archives of the UN’s International Labour Organization—before he went to live in one. He is completing an MSc in Responsible Tourism Management and founded CRETAN®, which appears here as a case study among the frameworks.
Read more about this resourceWhere to Go from Here
What Is Ethical Tourism?
The framework these choices sit in: the three questions, the five pillars, and the bar that outranks “can it last?”
Ethical Travel Guide for Crete
The same arithmetic, a different outcome: an island of 5.3 million visitors that has kept its culture—and how to visit without tipping it.
Ethical Tourism & Human Rights
Where consent comes from: the rights of the people behind the trip, and the standard this page scales down to a neighborhood.
Explore Our Companion Resources
- responsibletourism.com The systems side of the same problem: destination management, carrying capacity, and “better places for people to live in.”
- regenerativetravel.org Beyond doing less harm: travel that aims to leave a place—and the people who live there—measurably better than it found them.
- softtravel.com The antidote to the peak: slow, low-volume, off-season travel that spreads the load overtourism concentrates.
Last updated:
References
- World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), CELTH & NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences. 2018. ‘Overtourism’? Understanding and Managing Urban Tourism Growth beyond Perceptions — the study that examined the term across eight European cities, concluded it was a new buzzword for the older concepts of tourism congestion management and carrying capacity, and set out eleven strategies and 68 measures; it records international arrivals rising from 25 million (1950) to 1.3 billion (2017), with 1.8 billion forecast by 2030. UNWTO, Madrid (prepared with Breda University of Applied Sciences). https://doi.org/10.18111/9789284419999 (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- Euronews Travel. 2023. “Let it go”: the Austrian town that looks just like Frozen builds a fence to stop selfie-taking tourists — Hallstatt, a UNESCO village of roughly 800 residents, has drawn up to 10,000 visitors a day in peak season, and in May 2023 briefly erected a wooden barrier at a photo viewpoint before removing it after a backlash. Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/travel/2023/05/19/let-it-go-austrian-town-that-looks-just-like-frozen-builds-fence-to-stop-selfie-taking-tou (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- Milano, C., Novelli, M. & Cheer, J. M. 2019. Overtourism and Tourismphobia: A Journey Through Four Decades of Tourism Development, Planning and Local Concerns. Tourism Planning & Development 16(4), pp. 353–357 — defines overtourism through its victims (residents who “suffer the consequences of temporary and seasonal tourism peaks”) and dissects the media label “tourismphobia”. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2019.1599604 (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights — Article 25(1): everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for health and well-being, including housing. UN General Assembly. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- United Nations. 1966. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights — Article 11(1) makes the right to adequate housing binding on states parties; the CESCR’s General Comment No. 4 (1991) reads “adequate” to require, among other things, affordability and security of tenure. OHCHR. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- Harvey, D. 2008. The Right to the City. New Left Review 53, pp. 23–40 — reworking Henri Lefebvre’s 1968 concept (Le Droit à la ville) into “a right to change ourselves by changing the city … a common rather than an individual right”. New Left Review. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii53/articles/david-harvey-the-right-to-the-city (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- Gotham, K. F. 2005. Tourism Gentrification: The Case of New Orleans’ Vieux Carré (French Quarter). Urban Studies 42(7), pp. 1099–1121 — the transformation of a middle-class neighborhood into an affluent tourist enclave that displaces its residents. SAGE / Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500120881 (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- Sequera, J. & Nofre, J. 2018. Shaken, Not Stirred: New Debates on Touristification and the Limits of Gentrification. City 22(5–6), pp. 843–855 — argues touristification is a distinct process, displacement driven by the visitor who does not live there rather than by a wealthier resident. Taylor & Francis / City. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2018.1548819 (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- Barron, K., Kung, E. & Proserpio, D. 2021. The Effect of Home-Sharing on House Prices and Rents: Evidence from Airbnb. Marketing Science 40(1) — a 1% increase in Airbnb listings raises rents by about 0.018%, an effect large enough to account for roughly one-fifth of observed rent growth across US markets studied. INFORMS / Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2020.1227 (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- Catalan News / Forbes. 2024. Barcelona to eliminate all tourist apartments by November 2028 — Mayor Jaume Collboni’s 21 June 2024 announcement to end all 10,101 licensed tourist-flat (HUT) permits and return them to housing, citing rents up 68% and home-purchase prices up 38% over a decade. Catalan News (Catalan public-media wire); Forbes. https://www.catalannews.com/politics/item/barcelona-eliminate-tourist-apartments-november-2028-21-june-2024 (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- Fortune Europe / Associated Press. 2024. Amsterdam bans new hotels and moves to curb cruises — the city’s 2024 measures: no new hotels unless an existing one closes, a policy target of no more than 20 million tourist overnight stays a year (already exceeded), and a phased cap on cruise calls. Fortune; AP. https://fortune.com/europe/2024/07/04/amsterdam-nuisance-tourists-stay-away-banned-new-hotels-cruise-ships/ (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- The Maritime Executive. 2019. Dubrovnik puts a cap on daily cruise-ship arrivals — the “Respect the City” limit of a maximum two cruise ships and about 5,000 cruise passengers per day, agreed with the cruise industry in 2019 in response to UNESCO pressure on the walled Old Town. The Maritime Executive. https://maritime-executive.com/article/dubrovnik-puts-cap-on-daily-cruise-ship-arrivals (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- Euronews / Comune di Venezia. 2024. Venice’s day-tripper access fee — the €5 “contributo di accesso” trial applied on 29 days in 2024, issuing 485,062 passes and raising about €2.4 million; widely judged a failure at deterring day-trippers, it was expanded to 54 days for 2025. Euronews Travel. https://www.euronews.com/travel/2024/07/15/venices-tourist-tax-trial-ends-why-are-critics-calling-it-a-failure-and-how-many-people-pa (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- Campaign for a Living Venice. 2024. Venice drops below 49,000 residents — the historic-centre population, about 104,000 in 1975, has fallen under 49,000, the long decline residents call the “Venexodus”. Campaign for a Living Venice. https://campaignforalivingvenice.org/2024/04/09/venice-drops-below-49000-residents-and-the-mainland-grows/ (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- Smithsonian Magazine / Associated Press. 2023. Venice avoids being added to UNESCO’s list of endangered sites — in September 2023 the World Heritage Committee declined the World Heritage Centre’s recommendation to list Venice as World Heritage in Danger over mass tourism, development, and climate change, asking Italy for a fuller conservation plan. Smithsonian Magazine; AP. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/venice-unesco-world-heritage-danger-180982640/ (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- U.S. News & World Report / Associated Press. 2025. Protesters against overtourism take to the streets of southern Europe — on 15 June 2025 the SET network (Southern Europe against Touristification) coordinated demonstrations across some sixteen cities in Spain, Portugal, and Italy; it followed Barcelona’s July 2024 water-pistol march and the Canary Islands’ April 2024 protests, all centered on housing and displacement. U.S. News / AP. https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2025-06-15/protesters-against-overtourism-take-to-the-streets-of-southern-europe (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- Ajuntament de Barcelona (Ecologia Urbana). 2017. Special Urban Plan for Tourist Accommodation (PEUAT) — approved 27 January 2017 under Mayor Ada Colau, freezing new tourist-accommodation licences of any kind in the saturated central zone; annulled on a procedural point, it was re-approved with near-identical content in 2021. Ajuntament de Barcelona. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/ecologiaurbana/en/bodies-involved/citizen-participation/tourist-accommodation (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
- ARA (English edition). 2025. Spain’s Constitutional Court upholds the Catalan tourist-flat law (ruling STC 64/2025, 13 March 2025) — dismissing the challenge and holding that withdrawing a tourist licence is not an expropriation, because using a home for tourism is not an essential faculty of ownership. ARA. https://en.ara.cat/society/constitutional-court-hits-multi-million-dollar-claims-for-the-closure-of-tourist-apartments_1_5327638.html (accessed July 15, 2026). ↩
Further Reading
- ‘Overtourism’? Understanding and Managing Urban Tourism Growth beyond Perceptions — the report in full, plus Volume 2’s eighteen city case studies and UN Tourism’s visitor-management resources
UN Tourism (UNWTO) · UN Tourism
- Overtourism: Excesses, Discontents and Measures in Travel and Tourism — the standard academic volume on the phenomenon, its origins, and the tools proposed to manage it
Milano, C., Cheer, J. M. & Novelli, M. (eds.) · 2019 · CABI
- Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing — the UN mandate on the “financialization of housing,” the frame that links short-term-rental conversion to a rights violation
OHCHR · UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
- The interregional residents’ network behind the coordinated 2024–2025 protests — neighborhood assemblies and housing movements organizing against the touristification of their cities
Southern Europe against Touristification (SET) · SET Network
Our Editorial Standards
This is an independent resource, written and maintained by Steven Keen—a responsible tourism practitioner based on Crete, completing an MSc in Responsible Tourism Management and certified by the GSTC and ICRT. Every statistic is cited to its primary source, every page carries an honest last-updated date, and where a figure cannot be verified, we flag it—rather than guess. Seasonal claims—festivals, opening patterns, on-island services—are re-checked on the island as the seasons turn, and every reference carries the date it was last accessed. We disclose our connection to CRETAN®, which appears here as one documented case study among the frameworks.
Read our full editorial standards